|
|
Test Case taDOM2/5-taDOM2-25-CHtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PALCE CONSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node CHThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = CH , Write Set = CHFCE DCPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|