|
|
Test Case taDOM2/5-taDOM2-32-PStaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PALCE CONSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node PSThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on PS:Read Set = , Write Set = PS PAFCE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|