|
|
Test Case taDOM2/6-taDOM2-34-FCtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getFirstChild(contextElementNode) returns NodeThe getFirstChild operation returns the first child FC of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCOFCE
- readFC
- useFCPSE
Read Set = CO FC COFCE FCPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node FCThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the only child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyPALCE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on FC:Read Set = , Write Set = FC DC COFCE COLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | On CO the first child edge lock ER is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock SX on FC incompatible to existing lock NR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock SX on FC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|