|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/20-taDOM3+-31-PAtaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) returns NodeThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO CA , Write Set = AS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node PAThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on PA:Read Set = , Write Set = PA PS CO NS CS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock SX on PA incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock SX on PA incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock SX on PA incompatible to existing lock IX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|