|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/22-taDOM3+-20-NS
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) returns NodeThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO , Write Set = CA - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node NSThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = NS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|