|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/24-taDOM3+-17-COtaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child. The context element node CO has still no child nodes before this operation. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child.The new appended child node (the now only child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyCOLCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE COLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NRCX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node COThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NRCX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock NX on CO incompatible to existing lock NRCX.
| Incompatible | Test Case Ok |
|