|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/27-taDOM3+-32-COtaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation insertBefore(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertBefore operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new previous sibling node before the context node CO. There already exists a previous sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOPSE
- modifyPSNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = PSNSE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node COThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock NR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|