|
|
|
  Test Case taDOM3+/31-taDOM3+-17-CO
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node COThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatible| Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock NX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | | Test Case Ok |
|
