|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/31-taDOM3+-20-PStaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node PSThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on PS:Read Set = PS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|