UniKL Logo

Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik
FB Informatik
 
LG IS
AG DBIS
AG HIS
Jobs / Tasks
Courses
Publications
Contact
Misc
Impressum
(C) AG DBIS
  

Test Case taDOM3+/31-taDOM3+-22-NS

taDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothing

The deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.

Behavior specified with base operations:

  • modifyPSNSE
  • modifyNSPSE
  • writeCO
  • writeFC
  • writeCH
  • writeLC
  • writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]

taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node NS

The renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.

Bahavior specified with base operations:

  • readCO
  • writeCA

Read and write sets for execution on NS:

Read Set = NS , Write Set =
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
  • LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS

Operations must be compatible

CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS		Compatible
Test Case Ok