|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/31-taDOM3+-33-DCtaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node DCThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the last child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPALCE
- modifyPSNSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on DC:Read Set = , Write Set = DC DCLCE DCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on DC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on DC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on DC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|