|
|
|
  Test Case taDOM3+/32-taDOM3+-22-CH
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node CHThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = CH , Write Set = DC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be incompatible| Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | | Test Case Ok |
|
