|
|
Test Case taDOM3+/4-taDOM3+-5-CHtaDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns NodeThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read Set = CO NS CONSE NSPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) executed on node CHThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = CH COLCE CHNSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on CH
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on CH | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|