|
|
|
  Test Case taDOM3+/5-taDOM3+-34-AC
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PALCE CONSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
taDOM3+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node ACThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the only child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyPALCE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = , Write Set = AC PA PS CO CS NS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:EX,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on AC
Operations must be incompatible| Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:EX,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:EX,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | | Test Case Ok |
|
