|
|
Test Case taDOM3/29-taDOM3-22-LC
taDOM3 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyNSPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = CONSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3 Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node LCThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = LC , Write Set = DC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|