|
|
Test Case taDOM3/29-taDOM3-32-ACtaDOM3 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyNSPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = CONSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM3 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node ACThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = , Write Set = AC PA PS CO CS NS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|